The Pixar Problem


The front gates of Pixar headquarters in Emeryville, California. Image by Coolcaesar and retrieved from wikimedia.

  Ever since their first feature film Toy Story in 1995, Pixar films as well as the pixar brand have been globally regarded as an award-winning studio for their care and quality in their animated features and shorts. Whether it be relying on the well known or just a poor execution of new ideas.


Sequels, sequels, and more sequels!


Earlier in the studio’s history, Pixar sequels never really existed aside from the Toy Story franchise. But ever since the start of the 2010’s, Pixar sequels became more and more common over the decade. With almost all of them only being adequate films that added nothing to the original movie and not really justifying its existence aside from cashing in on a beloved property.

This will be explored shortly, but only a few original film ideas were ever released during this “sequel era”. Some of them were dull and not very interesting like The Good Dinosaur but others were good and sometimes even remarkable movies such as Brave, Coco, and Inside Out.

Now, the reason for these sequels is pretty obvious from a business perspective, Popular IP + More media = Profit, but wouldn’t it pay even more to make a sequel that actually builds upon its established? It’s actually a real thing that the Toy Story sequels have made more money in sequels than almost any other Pixar IP including Cars, Finding Nemo, and Monsters with The Incredibles being an exception.

Like mentioned before, these sequels do nothing to justify their existence other than to make bank. Some sequels even unravel and sometimes even retcon details from their predecessors. Such as in Monsters Inc. which establishes Mike and Sully as friends since the fourth grade. As Well as in the Incredibles 2 where the generic plot-twist villain is going on their “evil monologue” and telling their whole plan to the hero. While not directly retconning or unraveling stuff from the first movie, it’s still worth talking about how this scene missed the whole point of The Incredibles about mocking the superhero genre and its tropes.

However, the worst offender to the sequel problem is undoubtedly Toy Story 4. While still being a solid film it completely unravels and destroys plot points and characters that were established over 20 years ago. Buzz Lightyear, who has been shown to be the most strategic and smart toy of the group has devolved into a generic dimwitted comedy relief character. The other main characters such as Jessie, Rex, or the potato heads have been reduced to just side characters. 

But probably the most controversial character in this installment has to be Woody. Woody has always been the loyal toy of the group. Willing to stick with his owner no matter what. It has been shown through the 3 previous movies. Woody is afraid of being lost in Toy Story (TS1), Woody refusing to go to the Japanese toy museum in TS2, and Woody refusing to go to the Sunnyside Daycare in TS3. But In TS4? Woody doesn’t return home with the rest of the toys in order to stay with Bo Peep and be a lost toy. Completely unraveling his character that was present in everything that came before Toy Story 4.

Recently, more sequels have been announced via a Disney earnings report. In terms of Pixar, Toy Story 5 and Inside Out 2 were announced. While Inside Out has plenty of potential for its theme around emotions, many groans from Pixar fans could be heard around the world when TS5 was announced. They are now unraveling the bow of the ending a SECOND TIME in exchange for profit. However, there is an original idea in the works. Speaking of original ideas, let’s take a look at their most recent original films.


Original Ideas & Art Direction


Aside from the sea of unnecessary sequels, there are a few original flicks that Pixar has churned out recently. In this present decade, 2020, Pixar has released a number of 5 movies so far. The first of which, Onward was released right when a certain virus shut everything down, so of course it went straight to streaming, which sadly set the path for most of the other movies that were released from 2020 up to present day. 

Onward, a tale between two brothers to reunite their late dad, had what sounded like a great premise with its plot on dealing with the death of a loved one and brotherhood. But the film unfortunately did not deliver. Showcasing a generic world setting with a theme on death that wasn’t as powerful as it could’ve been when compared to films like Coco.

Soul was an odd masterpiece that held a bit of the essence and magic of Pixar films such as Ratatouille and Monsters Inc. However, this movie falls into the next problem with Pixar, their animation aesthetic and art direction. Recent films like Turning Red and Luca have differentiated themselves from the Pixar trope of everything being as realistic as possible. Although, it IS a technical marvel that stuff like hyper realistic cats, lighting, and dust particles can be made in animation, it’s inevitable to get to a point when you begin to question if these films can even be classified as cartoons. 

Soul is a prime example of this, the city landscapes and realistic textures look eerily close to live action footage, but all of that is thrown out the window with the clashing character styles. Ever since Sony’s Spiderman: Into Spider Verse released in 2018 and shook the medium of animation to its core, companies and studios whose artstyles have been previously inspired by Pixar had started to transition into a mix of CG and hand drawn animation. Examples range from Dreamworks’ The Bad Guys and Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Sony’s Mitchells vs. The Machines, and despite being released before Spiderverse, Blue Sky’s The Peanuts Movie.

Last year, Pixar had received their first ever box office bomb with Lightyear, an in-verse Toy Story Star Wars-esk movie that got Andy hooked on Buzz lightyear. Mostly because of its bland and generic Sci-Fi plot and its uninteresting visuals. With new animated movies coming out in the next decade with a new and refreshing look that stretches animation to its limits, Pixar could actually begin to fall behind in an industry where they were previously the top dog along with their corporate owner Disney.


What’s next for Pixar?


Pixar and their films have always been synonymous with quality, but in recent years, that title has begun to grow more questionable. With unnecessary sequels that don’t justify themselves, Pixar’s aging animation style, their overreliance on popular IP and nostalgia, and their notable lack of polish in their recent films. This article should not be taken as “Pixar can’t make good films anymore”, Pixar can still produce solid entertainment, it also shouldn’t be said that all Pixar films should be as emotional as the likes of Up or Toy Story 3. It just feels as if Pixar hasn’t been trying as hard as they used to.

As of right now, a new original Pixar movie is releasing this summer called Elemental, a forbidden love story with a girl made out of fire and a boy made from water. In which many fans have made fun of due to it being comically similar to Fireboy and Watergirl, a computer game from Jokes aside however, the setting is eerily similar to Disney’s Zootopia, a movie that takes place in an urban city run by anthropomorphic animals. The art style and character designs, while nice, don’t seem to be too creative either.

After Elemental though, the future of Pixar for the 2020’s is questionable. There could very well be an odd masterpiece every now and again, there could also be some films that are good if unremarkable. But, we can also expect to see movies that aren’t like that. Whether they are movies with an interesting premise but utterly fumbles the bag in execution, or they are movies that needlessly bank on nostalgia and the well-known.